We are often interested in knowing the area of a region. Forget momentarily that we addressed this already in Section 5. Section 5.4 and approach it instead using the technique described in Key Idea 7.0.1.
The issue to address next is how to systematically break a region into subregions. A graph will help. Consider Figure 7.1.1 (a) where a region between two curves is shaded. While there are many ways to break this into subregions, one particularly efficient way is to βsliceβ it vertically, as shown in Figure 7.1.1 (b), into equally spaced slices.
We now approximate the area of a slice. Again, we have many options, but using a rectangle seems simplest. Picking any -value in the th slice, we set the height of the rectangle to be , the difference of the corresponding -values. The width of the rectangle is a small difference in -values, which we represent with .Figure 7.1.1 (c) shows sample points chosen in each subinterval and appropriate rectangles drawn. (Each of these rectangles represents a differential element.) Each slice has an area approximately equal to ; hence, the total area is approximately the Riemann Sum
The graph verifies that the upper boundary of the region is given by and the lower bound is given by . Therefore the area of the region is the value of the integral
units
Figure7.1.4.Graphing an enclosed region in Example 7.1.3.
Figure7.1.6.Graphing a region enclosed by two functions in Example 7.1.5.
A quick calculation shows that at and 4. One can proceed thoughtlessly by computing , but this ignores the fact that on ,. (In fact, the thoughtless integration returns , hardly the expected value of an area.) Thus we compute the total area by breaking the interval into two subintervals, and and using the proper integrand in each.
The previous example makes note that we are expecting area to be positive. When first learning about the definite integral, we interpreted it as βsigned area under the curve,β allowing for βnegative area.β That doesnβt apply here; area is to be positive.
The previous example also demonstrates that we often have to break a given region into subregions before applying Theorem 7.1.2. The following example shows another situation where this is applicable, along with an alternate view of applying the Theorem.
We give two approaches to this problem. In the first approach, we notice that the regionβs βtopβ is defined by two different curves. On , the top function is ; on , the top function is .
Thus we compute the area as the sum of two integrals:
Total Area
The second approach is clever and very useful in certain situations. We are used to viewing curves as functions of ; we input an -value and a -value is returned. Some curves can also be described as functions of : input a -value and an -value is returned. We can rewrite the equations describing the boundary by solving for :
Figure7.1.9.The region used in Example 7.1.7 with boundaries relabeled as functions of .
Figure 7.1.9 shows the region with the boundaries relabeled. A differential element, a horizontal rectangle, is also pictured. The width of the rectangle is a small change in :. The height of the rectangle is a difference in -values. The βtopβ -value is the largest value, i.e., the rightmost. The βbottomβ -value is the smaller, i.e., the leftmost. Therefore the height of the rectangle is
The area is found by integrating the above function with respect to with the appropriate bounds. We determine these by considering the -values the region occupies. It is bounded below by , and bounded above by . That is, both the βtopβ and βbottomβ functions exist on the interval . Thus
This calculusβbased technique of finding area can be useful even with shapes that we normally think of as βeasy.β Example 7.1.10 computes the area of a triangle. While the formula β base height β is well known, in arbitrary triangles it can be nontrivial to compute the height. Calculus makes the problem simple.
Recognize that there are two βtopβ functions to this region, causing us to use two definite integrals.
Total Area
Figure7.1.11.Graphing a triangular region in Example 7.1.10.
We can also approach this by converting each function into a function of . This also requires 2 integrals, so there isnβt really any advantage to doing so. We do it here for demonstration purposes.
The βtopβ function is always while there are two βbottomβ functions. Being mindful of the proper integration bounds, we have
Total Area
Of course, the final answer is the same. (It is interesting to note that the area of all 4 subregions used is 3/4. This is coincidental.)
While we have focused on producing exact answers, we are also able to make approximations using the principle of Theorem 7.1.2. The integrand in the theorem is a distance (βtop minus bottomβ); integrating this distance function gives an area. By taking discrete measurements of distance, we can approximate an area using numerical integration techniques developed in Section 5.5. The following example demonstrates this.
To approximate the area of a lake, shown in Figure 7.1.13.(a), the βlengthβ of the lake is measured at 200-foot increments as shown in Figure 7.1.13.(b), where the lengths are given in hundreds of feet. Approximate the area of the lake.
The measurements of length can be viewed as measuring βtop minus bottomβ of two functions. The exact answer is found by integrating , but of course we donβt know the functions and . Our discrete measurements instead allow us to approximate.
(a)
(b)
Figure7.1.13.(a) A sketch of a lake, and (b) the lake with length measurements.
We have the following data points:
We also have that , so Simpsonβs Rule gives
Area units
Since the measurements are in hundreds of feet, units ft ft , giving a total area of ft . (Since we are approximating, weβd likely say the area was about ft , which is a little more than 10 acres.)
Answers may vary; one common answer is when the region has two or more βtopβ or βbottomβ functions when viewing the region with respect to , but has only 1 βtopβ function and 1 βbottomβ function when viewed with respect to . The former area requires multiple integrals to compute, whereas the latter area requires one.
In Exercises 33β42, use the Direct Comparison Test or the Limit Comparison Test to determine whether the given definite integral converges or diverges. Clearly state what test is being used and what function the integrand is being compared to.